Skip Navigation



European Sociological Review Advance Access published online on September 27, 2007

European Sociological Review, doi:10.1093/esr/jcm037
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/1/97    most recent
jcm037v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Knudsen, K.
Right arrow Articles by Wærness, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

National Context and Spouses’ Housework in 34 Countries

Knud Knudsen

Kari Wærness

Kari Wærness, Instiute of Sociology, Rosenbergsgaten 39, N-5015 Bergen, Norway. Email: Kari.Warness{at}skok.uib.no

Correspondence: Knud Knudsen (to whom correspondence should be addressed), IKMS, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stavanger, N-4036 Stavanger, Norway. Email: Knud.Knudsen{at}uis.no

By focusing on how national context and individual factors affect spouses’ absolute and relative contributions, social scientists are better able to understand couples’ organising and sharing of housework. Previous studies have suggested a linkage between female empowerment and the division of housework; however, documented effects have proven inconsistent. The authors propose that a less pronounced cross-national pattern for relative efforts reflects the fact that national context affect wives’ and husbands’ total involvement in the same direction. A reinterpretation of the ‘discount’ hypothesis is also suggested, relating interaction effects for relative efforts to non-interaction for spouses’ total contributions. Moreover, extending the causal model to include economic development as a macro-level explanatory variable permits a nuanced account of how different aspects of national context affect wives’ and husbands’ housework decisions. Within this extended framework the initially weak female empowerment—relative division linkage appears stronger. Based on a multilevel analysis of recently released data from 34 countries in the International Social Survey Programme (ISSP), this article, on a wider basis than hitherto possible, jointly analyses spouses’ absolute and relative contributions, and investigates the interplay between macro-level forces and individual-level factors in influencing couples’ domestic labour.

Manuscript received: October 1, 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Sociol RevHome page
L. Ruppanner
Conflict and Housework: Does Country Context Matter?
Eur. Sociol. Rev., July 29, 2009; (2009) jcp038v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soc Sci Jpn ResHome page
S. NORTH
Negotiating What's 'Natural': Persistent Domestic Gender Role Inequality in Japan
Soc. Sci. Jpn. Res., June 1, 2009; 12(1): 23 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Sociol RevHome page
M. Voicu, B. Voicu, and K. Strapcova
Housework and Gender Inequality in European Countries
Eur. Sociol. Rev., June 1, 2009; 25(3): 365 - 377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of European Social PolicyHome page
E. Bernhardt, T. Noack, and T. H. Lyngstad
Shared housework in Norway and Sweden: advancing the gender revolution
Journal of European Social Policy, August 1, 2008; 18(3): 275 - 288.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.