Skip Navigation



European Sociological Review Advance Access published online on April 28, 2006
European Sociological Review, doi:10.1093/esr/jcl001
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/4/353    most recent
jcl001v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Franzen, A.
Right arrow Articles by Hangartner, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Article

Social Networks and Labour Market Outcomes: The Non-Monetary Benefits of Social Capital

Axel Franzen 1 * and Dominik Hangartner 2

1 Institute of Sociology, RWTH Aachen, Eilfschornsteinstr. 7, D-52062 Aachen, Germany
2 Institute of Sociology, University of Bern, Lerchenweg 36, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Axel Franzen, E-mail: axel.franzen{at}soziologie.rwth-aachen.de


  Abstract

We contrast Granovetter’s hypothesis (Granovetter, M. (1973). American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380; Granovetter, M. (1974). Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers. University of Chicago Press; Granovetter, M. (1995). Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers. University of Chicago Press) that social networks help individuals to find better-paid jobs with a new model, which predicts that networks are helpful with respect to non-pecuniary job characteristics but not concerning the monetary pay-offs. Following Montgomery (Montgomery, J. D. (1992) American Sociological Review, 57, 586-596), our model is a combination of classical job-search theory and the network hypothesis. First, concerning the monetary consequences, we test our hypotheses empirically by analysing the 2001 International Social Survey Programme on social relations and support systems. We show that using social ties is a common job-search strategy in all countries. However, using social networks does not increase the monetary pay-off. Second, we use a sample of 8,000 Swiss university graduates who recently entered the labour market to show that informal job-search channels are beneficial with respect to important non-monetary job characteristics. Thus, graduates who received their jobs through social contacts tended to get jobs that are linked to their educational degree and offer better career perspectives. Furthermore, using personal networks is related to lower search costs. Therefore, the results suggest overall that networks improve the non-pecuniary characteristics but not the monetary pay-offs.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Eur Sociol RevHome page
S. Ruiter and N. D. De Graaf
Socio-economic Payoffs of Voluntary Association Involvement: A Dutch Life Course Study
Eur. Sociol. Rev., August 1, 2009; 25(4): 425 - 442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 European Urban and Regional StudiesHome page
R. Waters and H. Lawton Smith
Social Networks in High-Technology Local Economies: The Cases of Oxfordshire and Cambridgeshire
European Urban and Regional Studies, January 1, 2008; 15(1): 21 - 37.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.