Skip Navigation



European Sociological Review Advance Access published online on December 12, 2005

European Sociological Review, doi:10.1093/esr/jci042
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/1/61    most recent
jci042v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Polavieja, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Article

The Incidence of Temporary Employment in Advanced Economies: Why is Spain Different?

Javier G. Polavieja 1 *

1 Pompeu Fabra University, Department of Political and Social Sciences, Ramon Trias Fargas, 25-27, 08005 Barcelona, Spain

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Javier G. Polavieja, E-mail: javier.polavieja{at}upf.edu


   Abstract

This study analyses the determinants of the rate of temporary employment in 15 advanced economies using both macro-level data drawn from the OECD and EUROSTAT databases, as well as micro-level data drawn from the eighth wave of the European Household Panel. Comparative analysis is set out to test different explanations originally formulated for the Spanish case. The evidence suggests that the overall distribution of temporary employment in the analysed countries does not seem to be explicable by the characteristics of national productive structures. This evidence seems at odds with previous interpretations based on segmentation theories. As an alternative explanation, two types of supply-side factors are tested: crowding-out effects and educational gaps in the workforce. Both seem ill suited to explain the distribution of temporary work in the analysed economies. Institutional factors do, however, seem to play an important role. Multivariate analysis shows that the level of institutional protection in standard employment during the 1980s, together with the degree of coordinated centralization of the collective bargaining system, seem to have a significant impact on the distribution of temporary employment in the countries examined. Yet these institutional variables alone still fail to account for the Spanish difference. The Spanish puzzle seems, however, explicable when an interaction between employment protection in standard contracts and unemployment shocks is accounted for. This interaction is expected from a theoretical standpoint and proves consistent with both country-specific and comparative evidence.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Sociol RevHome page
J. Giesecke
Socio-economic Risks of Atypical Employment Relationships: Evidence from the German Labour Market
Eur. Sociol. Rev., December 1, 2009; 25(6): 629 - 646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Sociol RevHome page
P. Barbieri and S. Scherer
Labour Market Flexibilization and its Consequences in Italy
Eur. Sociol. Rev., December 1, 2009; 25(6): 677 - 692.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Comparative SociologyHome page
J. Giesecke and S. Schindler
Field of Study and Flexible Work: A Comparison between Germany and the UK
International Journal of Comparative Sociology, August 1, 2008; 49(4-5): 283 - 304.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Comparative SociologyHome page
E. Saar, M. Unt, and I. Kogan
Transition from Educational System to Labour Market in the European Union: A Comparison between New and Old Members
International Journal of Comparative Sociology, February 1, 2008; 49(1): 31 - 59.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.