European Sociological Review Advance Access originally published online on July 22, 2008
European Sociological Review 2009 25(1):103-122; doi:10.1093/esr/jcn037
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Losers in Market Transition: The Unemployed, the Retired, and the Disabled
Wim Jansen, Department of Methodology and Statistics/ICS, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jos Dessens, Department of Methodology and Statistics/ICS, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Correspondence: Willem-Jan Verhoeven (to whom correspondence should be addressed), Faculty of Law/Criminology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Email: verhoeven{at}frg.eur.nl
The market transition debate is almost primarily focused on the ‘winners’ and on what happens to the formerly privileged during the market transformation process in post-Communist societies. This study emphasizes the impact of the market transformation process on the income of those who have few resources and are eligible for social benefits. Are these people the ‘real’ losers of the market transformation process in post-Communist societies? OLS regression models are estimated based on 50 standardized cross-sectional surveys on the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Russia, and Slovakia covering a period from 1991 to 2002. The analyses show that the unemployed have the lowest income and that the income of retirement and disability pensioners is relatively protected, especially during the early transformation years. Education seems to be a helpful resource for the unemployed and pensioners, but not specifically during the turbulent early transformation years. Results on the income effect of urban residence are inconclusive.
Manuscript received: June 1, 2007.