European Sociological Review Advance Access originally published online on April 18, 2007
European Sociological Review 2007 23(4):505-519; doi:10.1093/esr/jcm014
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Explaining Educational Decision and Effects of Families’ Social Class Position: An Empirical Test of the Breen–Goldthorpe Model of Educational Attainment
Volker Stocké, Department of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, Project Program ‘Rationality Concepts, Decision Behaviour and Economic Modeling’, D-68131 Mannheim, Germany. Tel: +49 (0)621-181-3432; fax: +49 (0)621-181-3461; Email: vstocke{at}rumms.uni-mannheim.de
This article tests whether the Breen–Goldthorpe model offers an empirically valid prediction of educational decisions and a complete explanation of how they are affected by social class. This is done using data from a panel study of families who had decided on secondary school tracks for their children in Germany. First, we analysed whether class differences in the costs, success probabilities, and returns from status maintenance, which parents associate with educational options, are created by differences in the families’ objective opportunities and constraints. Consistent with theoretical expectations, we found class effects on the parents’ subjective beliefs and evaluations, which were due to differences in available economic resources and the children's proven academic ability. Secondly, we tested the prediction that secondary school choice and the effect of class differences on it are the result of cost–benefit considerations. Whereas the subjective beliefs about how likely the children are to complete educational degrees and the motive to maintain the families’ social status proved to be strong predictors for educational decisions, the anticipated costs of educational investments were found to be irrelevant. Inconsistent with predictions, the direct effects of social class on educational decisions were not explained by the theoretically predicted factors.
Manuscript received: July 1, 2006.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  N. Tieben Parental Resources and Relative Risk Aversion in Intra-secondary Transitions: A Trend Analysis of Non-standard Educational Decision Situations in the Netherlands Eur. Sociol. Rev., November 23, 2009; (2009) jcp053v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Reimer and R. Pollak Educational Expansion and Its Consequences for Vertical and Horizontal Inequalities in Access to Higher Education in West Germany Eur. Sociol. Rev., June 11, 2009; (2009) jcp029v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Gabay-Egozi, Y. Shavit, and M. Yaish Curricular Choice: A Test of a Rational Choice Model of Education Eur. Sociol. Rev., June 5, 2009; (2009) jcp031v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Erikson and F. Rudolphi Change in Social Selection to Upper Secondary School--Primary and Secondary Effects in Sweden Eur. Sociol. Rev., May 15, 2009; (2009) jcp022v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Becker and A. E. Hecken Why are Working-class Children Diverted from Universities?--An Empirical Assessment of the Diversion Thesis Eur. Sociol. Rev., April 1, 2009; 25(2): 233 - 250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Becker and A. E. Hecken Higher Education or Vocational Training?: An Empirical Test of the Rational Action Model of Educational Choices Suggested by Breen and Goldthorpe and Esser Acta Sociologica, March 1, 2009; 52(1): 25 - 45. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. T. Pfeffer Persistent Inequality in Educational Attainment and its Institutional Context Eur. Sociol. Rev., December 1, 2008; 24(5): 543 - 565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Schneider Social Inequality in Educational Participation in the German School System in a Longitudinal Perspective: Pathways into and out of the most Prestigious School Track Eur. Sociol. Rev., September 1, 2008; 24(4): 511 - 526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|