European Sociological Review Advance Access originally published online on December 12, 2005
European Sociological Review 2006 22(1):61-78; doi:10.1093/esr/jci042
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Incidence of Temporary Employment in Advanced Economies: Why is Spain Different?
Pompeu Fabra University, Department of Political and Social Sciences, Ramon Trias Fargas, 25–27, 08005 Barcelona, Spain.Tel.: +34 93 542 29 05; fax: +34 93 542 23 72; Email: javier.polavieja{at}upf.edu.
This study analyses the determinants of the rate of temporary employment in 15 advanced economies using both macro-level data drawn from the OECD and EUROSTAT databases, as well as micro-level data drawn from the eighth wave of the European Household Panel. Comparative analysis is set out to test different explanations originally formulated for the Spanish case. The evidence suggests that the overall distribution of temporary employment in the analysed countries does not seem to be explicable by the characteristics of national productive structures. This evidence seems at odds with previous interpretations based on segmentation theories. As an alternative explanation, two types of supply-side factors are tested: crowding-out effects and educational gaps in the workforce. Both seem ill suited to explain the distribution of temporary work in the analysed economies. Institutional factors do, however, seem to play an important role. Multivariate analysis shows that the level of institutional protection in standard employment during the 1980s, together with the degree of coordinated centralization of the collective bargaining system, seem to have a significant impact on the distribution of temporary employment in the countries examined. Yet these institutional variables alone still fail to account for the Spanish difference. The Spanish puzzle seems, however, explicable when an interaction between employment protection in standard contracts and unemployment shocks is accounted for. This interaction is expected from a theoretical standpoint and proves consistent with both country-specific and comparative evidence.
Manuscript received: February 1, 2005.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. Giesecke Socio-economic Risks of Atypical Employment Relationships: Evidence from the German Labour Market Eur. Sociol. Rev., December 1, 2009; 25(6): 629 - 646. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Barbieri and S. Scherer Labour Market Flexibilization and its Consequences in Italy Eur. Sociol. Rev., December 1, 2009; 25(6): 677 - 692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Giesecke and S. Schindler Field of Study and Flexible Work: A Comparison between Germany and the UK International Journal of Comparative Sociology, August 1, 2008; 49(4-5): 283 - 304. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Saar, M. Unt, and I. Kogan Transition from Educational System to Labour Market in the European Union: A Comparison between New and Old Members International Journal of Comparative Sociology, February 1, 2008; 49(1): 31 - 59. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|