Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lindenberg, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

European Sociological Review 12:147-157 1996
© 1996 Oxford University Press

research-article

Choice-Centred versus Subject-Centred Theories in the Social Sciences: The Influence of Simplification on Explananda

Siegwart Lindenberg

ICS/Department of Sociology, University of Groningen Grote Rozenstraat 31, 9712 TG Groningen, The Netherlands

The idea, originating in economics and forcefully brought back by Goldthorpe, that rational choice theory and large-scale data analysis are symbiotic, is very attractive. Rational choice is in dire need of explananda which can be provided by large-scale data analysis, while large-scale data analysis is in dire need of an explanatory device; at the moment, rational choice can provide this better than any alternative approach. However, this idea is limited. It can only be applied to situations in which the specific simplifications made in rational choice model-building do not seriously affect the explananda. Ignoring this complication has created a very unsatisfactory use of rational choice theories in economics and sociology alike: a choice-centred approach in which the main task is to show that choice theory can be applied to the phenomena at hand, rather than to advancing knowledge in the field that specializes in the study of the phenomenon. What is needed is a subject-centred approach in which the quality criteria are related to advancement in the field, with rational choice theory taking a back seat. For a subject-centred approach, we need to have so-called ‘feeder theories’ which inform us about the impact of model specifications on explananda. If the simplication disregards important tendencies of human behaviour (such as short-sightedness), it cannot even acknowledge explananda of the ways people try to deal with these tendencies (say, by norms that shorten the time-horizon). There can thus be a direct relationship between the kind of simplification and the reality under consideration. Feeder theories thus open up the possibility of studying the interactive relationship between rational choice theory and explananda (be they from large-scale data analysis, from experiments, or from historical descriptions) and avoiding a choke-centred approach in favour of a subject-centred approach.

Manuscript received: February 1, 1996.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 SociologyHome page
F. Devine
Class Analysis and the Stability of Class Relations
Sociology, February 1, 1998; 32(1): 23 - 42.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Rationality and SocietyHome page
J. H. Goldthorpe
THE INTEGRATION OF SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH AND THEORY: GROUNDS FOR OPTIMISM AT THE END OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY
Rationality and Society, November 1, 1997; 9(4): 405 - 426.
[Abstract]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.