Skip Navigation



European Sociological Review Advance Access published online on July 14, 2009

European Sociological Review, doi:10.1093/esr/jcp036
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brandl, B.
Right arrow Articles by Traxler, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Labour Conflicts: A Cross-national Analysis of Economic and Institutional Determinants, 1971–2002

Bernd Brandl and Franz Traxler

Correspondence: Bernd Brandl (to whom correspondence should be addressed), Department of Industrial Sociology, University of Vienna, Bruenner Strasse 72, A-1210 Vienna, Austria. Email: bernd.brandl{at}unvie.ac.at

Correspondence: Franz Traxler, Department of Industrial Sociology, University of Vienna, Bruenner Strasse 72, A-1210 Vienna, Austria. Email: franz.traxler{at}univie.ac.at

Research in labour conflicts crosscuts disciplines. Economists assign the incidence of labour conflicts to the economic development. The institutionalist camp is divided upon whether the power of organized labour or the industrial relations system is the main determinant of conflicts. All these approaches have run into difficulties when it comes to explaining the conflict patterns since 1970. Although empirical studies have combined economic and institutional explanations, important problems remain: A conceptual framework which links economic to institutional factors is lacking; the focus on labour power ignores the relational character of power; endogeneity problems are neglected; quantitative studies covering a larger number of institutional variables are merely cross-sectional, whereas TSCS analyses examine only a few of them. This paper tries to overcome these shortcomings. Its theoretical approach interprets labour conflicts as a problem of union choice which is embedded in a specific economic and institutional context. The hypotheses on these contextual factors are tested, using time-series data for 19 countries. The findings show that the trend towards social peace primarily follows from changes in the economic context, along with a weakening of the unions relative to employers. Cross-national differences in the incidence of conflicts persist mainly due to ‘sticky’ corporatist institutions.

Manuscript received: February 1, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.