Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WATTS, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

European Sociological Review 9:315-319 1993
© 1993 Oxford University Press


research-article

Explaining Trends in Occupational Segregation: Some Comments

MARTIN WATTS

Dept. of Economics, University of Newcastle New South Wales 2308, Australia.

It is argued that Hakim (1992) is correct in claiming that no single index can measure the extent of horizontal and vertical sex segregation by occupation. In her attempts to explain trends in occupational segregation in Britain, however, she has provided an inconsistent picture of the overall pattern of change and utilized the concept of vertical segregation incorrectly. The Karmel and Maclachlan index and its decomposition over time provide a rigorous foundation to the measurement of (horizontal) occupational sex segregation. It can be complemented by case studies and carefully defined summary statistics to explore other dimensions of segregation.

Manuscript received: January 1, 1993.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Review of Radical Political EconomicsHome page
M. J. Watts
Trends in Occupational Segregation by Race and Gender in the U.S.A., 1983-92: A Multidimensional Approach
Review of Radical Political Economics, December 1, 1995; 27(4): 1 - 36.
[Abstract]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
J. Rubery and C. Fagan
Gender Segregation in Societal Context
Work Employment Society, June 1, 1995; 9(2): 213 - 240.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
M. J. Watts
A Critique of Marginal Matching
Work Employment Society, September 1, 1994; 8(3): 421 - 431.
[PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.