European Sociological Review 9:315-319 1993
© 1993 Oxford University Press
research-article |
Explaining Trends in Occupational Segregation: Some Comments
Dept. of Economics, University of Newcastle New South Wales 2308, Australia.
It is argued that Hakim (1992) is correct in claiming that no single index can measure the extent of horizontal and vertical sex segregation by occupation. In her attempts to explain trends in occupational segregation in Britain, however, she has provided an inconsistent picture of the overall pattern of change and utilized the concept of vertical segregation incorrectly. The Karmel and Maclachlan index and its decomposition over time provide a rigorous foundation to the measurement of (horizontal) occupational sex segregation. It can be complemented by case studies and carefully defined summary statistics to explore other dimensions of segregation.
Manuscript received: January 1, 1993.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. J. Watts Trends in Occupational Segregation by Race and Gender in the U.S.A., 1983-92: A Multidimensional Approach Review of Radical Political Economics, December 1, 1995; 27(4): 1 - 36. [Abstract] |
||||
![]() |
J. Rubery and C. Fagan Gender Segregation in Societal Context Work Employment Society, June 1, 1995; 9(2): 213 - 240. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Watts A Critique of Marginal Matching Work Employment Society, September 1, 1994; 8(3): 421 - 431. [PDF] |
||||

