European Sociological Review Advance Access originally published online on November 20, 2008
European Sociological Review 2009 25(4):489-504; doi:10.1093/esr/jcn064
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Welfare States, Labour Market Institutions and the Working Poor: A Comparative Analysis of 20 European Countries
Henning Lohmann, German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP), German Institute for Economic Research, DIW Berlin, 10108 Berlin, Germany. Email: hlohmann{at}diw.de
This article regards the incidence of in-work poverty and how it is reduced by the payment of social transfers in 20 European countries. It combines a micro- and a macro-level perspective in two-level models. The basis for the analysis is micro-data from the EU Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC) 2005 and macro-data from sources such as the OECD and Eurostat. The broad comparative perspective allows for a separation of different institutional influences, namely the influence of the degree of decommodification, defamilization, and bargaining centralization. In contrast to previous studies on the working poor which have mainly described country differences in in-work poverty, this article focuses on the question of how such differences can be explained from a broader perspective of poverty research. In general, the results confirm the overall hypothesis that both welfare state measures and labour market institutions have an influence on in-work poverty. By analysing influences on pre-transfer poverty and poverty reduction separately, the author shows that such factors have varied effects on in-work poverty. While bargaining centralization proves to be relevant for the distribution of pre-transfer incomes only, the set-up of the social security system, in particular, impacts the extent of poverty reduction.
Manuscript received: March 1, 2008.