Skip Navigation


European Sociological Review Advance Access originally published online on July 18, 2007
European Sociological Review 2008 24(1):1-17; doi:10.1093/esr/jcm029
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/1/1    most recent
jcm029v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hansen, M. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Rational Action Theory and Educational Attainment. Changes in the Impact of Economic Resources

Marianne Nordli Hansen

University of Oslo, Department of Sociology and Human Geography, PO Box 1096 Blindern, N–0317 Oslo. Email: mnhansen{at}sosiologi.uio.no

The article addresses the question of whether the impact of economic resources on educational attainment has changed over time. According to the rational action perspective, variations in parental economic resources should be an important source of inequality in educational attainment, because richer families most easily can pay for their children's education. Moreover, inequalities should increase in periods with increasing economic inequality and insecurity. There is no large body of systematic empirical knowledge supporting these assumptions. The data used here is a large sample consisting of the total cohorts of Norwegians born between 1955 and 1984, thus covering the thirty-year period up to the most recent years. Parental economic resources are measured as the mean earnings of father and mother the five years before leaving compulsory school. The analyses indicate that the impact of economic resources has varied in a curvilinear fashion, with decreasing inequality among the older cohorts and increasing inequality among the younger cohorts. This pattern fits well with expectations based on economic developments in Norway in the period as economic inequality and unemployment increased in the period with increasing inequality in educational attainment.

Manuscript received: June 1, 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Eur Sociol RevHome page
L. Reisel and I. Brekke
Minority Dropout in Higher Education: A Comparison of the United States and Norway using Competing Risk Event History Analysis
Eur. Sociol. Rev., September 21, 2009; (2009) jcp045v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Sociol RevHome page
O. N. Wiborg and M. N. Hansen
Change over Time in the Intergenerational Transmission of Social Disadvantage
Eur. Sociol. Rev., June 1, 2009; 25(3): 379 - 394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.