Skip Navigation


European Sociological Review Advance Access originally published online on April 3, 2007
European Sociological Review 2007 23(4):423-435; doi:10.1093/esr/jcm013
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/4/423    most recent
jcm013v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pichler, F.
Right arrow Articles by Wallace, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Patterns of Formal and Informal Social Capital in Europe

Florian Pichler and Claire Wallace

Claire Wallace, Department of Sociology, New Europe Centre Aberdeen, University of Aberdeen, Dunbar Street, Aberdeen AB24 3QY, UK. Email: claire.wallace{at}abdn.ac.uk

Correspondence: Florian Pichler (to whom correspondance should be addressed), Department of Sociology, New Europe Centre Aberdeen, University of Aberdeen, Dunbar Street, Aberdeen AB24 3QY, UK. Tel.: +44-1224-272647; fax: +44-1224-273442; Email: florian.pichler{at}abdn.ac.uk

Studies of social capital have concentrated upon either formal associative behaviour or informal social relations (networks). This article looks at the relationship between these two types of social capital by examining social networks, social and family support (informal social capital) on the one hand and associational behaviour along with social trust (formal social capital) on the other. Using the Eurobarometer 62.2 covering a representative sample of 27 countries the analysis found that with this approach, regions in Europe can be grouped according to the two dimensions, whether they are high on both forms of social capital (complementarity) or whether informal social capital substitutes for formal social capital (substitution). The Scandinavian countries and the Netherlands had the highest levels of all forms of social capital. In the South and East of Europe informal social capital was more important, but whilst in the South this was mainly in the form of family support, in the East informal support outside the family was also important. Thus, we can speak of ‘social capital regimes’ to better understand the various cultures of participation and cohesion across Europe.

Manuscript received: October 1, 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Acta SociologicaHome page
E. van Ingen
Social Participation Revisited: Disentangling and Explaining Period, Life-Cycle and Cohort Effects
Acta Sociologica, June 1, 2008; 51(2): 103 - 121.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Sociol RevHome page
M. Gesthuizen, T. van der Meer, and P. Scheepers
Education and Dimensions of Social Capital: Do Educational Effects Differ due to Educational Expansion and Social Security Expenditure?
Eur. Sociol. Rev., March 12, 2008; (2008) jcn021v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.