Skip Navigation


European Sociological Review Advance Access originally published online on December 13, 2006
European Sociological Review 2007 23(2):123-137; doi:10.1093/esr/jcl024
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/2/123    most recent
jcl024v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, O.
Right arrow Articles by Katz-Gerro, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The Omnivore Thesis Revisited: Voracious Cultural Consumers

Oriel Sullivan and Tally Katz-Gerro

Tally Katz-Gerro, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Haifa, Haifa 31905, Israel. Email: tkatz{at}soc.haifa.ac.il

Correspondence: Oriel Sullivan (to whom correspondence should be addressed), Department of Behavioural Sciences, Ben-Gurion University, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel. Email: sullivan{at}bgu.ac.il

We augment measures of cultural omnivorousness, based theoretically on the breadth of cultural tastes, with a new but related dimension of voraciousness. This reflects a ‘quantitative’ dimension of leisure consumption based upon both the range and the frequency of leisure participation. Voraciousness is theoretically interpreted in relation to notions of cultural repertoires, to the changing pace of work and leisure in late modernity, and to the ‘insatiable’ quality of contemporary consumption. From British time use data, voraciousness proved to share many relationships found in the analysis of omnivorousness, for example, with educational qualifications and job's social status. Moreover, these relationships persisted over time irrespective of individuals’ time and money resources. Since voraciousness is associated with high status individuals, and since it is not primarily about the availability of time or money, we argue that it is a symbolic status marker associated with notions such as being harried, keeping busy, multitasking, and embracing a diverse cultural consumption pattern.

Manuscript received: January 1, 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Cultural SociologyHome page
M. Santoro
Culture As (And After) Production
Cultural Sociology, March 1, 2008; 2(1): 7 - 31.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Time SocietyHome page
O. Sullivan
Busyness, Status Distinction and Consumption Strategies of the Income Rich, Time Poor
Time Society, March 1, 2008; 17(1): 5 - 26.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.