Skip Navigation


European Sociological Review Advance Access originally published online on December 4, 2006
European Sociological Review 2007 23(1):35-47; doi:10.1093/esr/jcl018
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/1/35    most recent
jcl018v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fahey, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The Case for an EU-wide Measure of Poverty

Tony Fahey

The Economic and Social Research Institute, 4 Burlington Road, Dublin 4, Ireland.

Correspondence: Email: tony.fahey{at}esri.ie

Income poverty in the European Union (EU) is normally measured with reference to income thresholds defined at the level of each Member State, independently of any consideration of inequalities in income between Member States. This approach has come under strain as a consequence of the recent enlargement of the EU: income differences between Member States are now so wide that what is defined as the poverty threshold in the richer Member States would count as an above-average income in the poorer Member States. This article proposes that, in order to cope with empirical and policy issues arising in this new situation, measures of poverty based on EU-wide thresholds need to be utilized alongside existing measures. Indicators of objective living conditions and subjective feelings of deprivation are used to show that the very high poverty rates in poorer Member States that an EU-wide poverty measure would produce are empirically meaningful, in that they reflect the low living standards and a strong sense of deprivation experienced by large proportions of the population in those states. They are also relevant for policy, but in a context where EU anti-poverty policy is linked as much with the EU convergence project and the single EU labour market as of social policy in the usual sense.

Manuscript received: November 1, 2005.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Sociol RevHome page
C. T. Whelan and B. Maitre
Comparing Poverty Indicators in an Enlarged European Union
Eur. Sociol. Rev., October 23, 2009; (2009) jcp047v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of European Social PolicyHome page
C. T. Whelan and B. Maitre
Europeanization of inequality and European reference groups
Journal of European Social Policy, May 1, 2009; 19(2): 117 - 130.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Sociol RevHome page
M. Heidenreich and C. Wunder
Patterns of Regional Inequality in the Enlarged Europe
Eur. Sociol. Rev., February 1, 2008; 24(1): 19 - 36.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.