European Sociological Review Advance Access originally published online on August 22, 2006
European Sociological Review 2006 22(5):533-560; doi:10.1093/esr/jcl012
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Economic Consequences of Partnership Dissolution—A Comparative Analysis of Panel Studies from Belgium, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, and Sweden
Hans-Jürgen Andreß (to whom correspondence should be addressed), Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät, Universität Köln, Herbert-Lewin-Str. 2, 50931 Köln, Germany. Email: hja{at}wiso.uni-koeln.de.
Barbara Borgloh, Fakultät für Soziologie, Universität Bielefeld, Dekanat, Postfach 10 01 31, 33501 Bielefeld, Germany.
Miriam Bröckel, Fakultät für Soziologie, Universität Bielefeld, Dekanat, Postfach 10 01 31, 33501 Bielefeld, Germany.
Marco Giesselmann, Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät, Universität Köln, Herbert-Lewin-Str. 2, 50931 Köln, Germany.
Dina Hummelsheim, Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät, Universität Köln, Herbert-Lewin-Str. 2, 50931 Köln, Germany.
The paper analyses the economic consequences of partnership dissolution in different institutional settings. Belgium, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, and Sweden are selected as representatives of four prototypical models of family support (market model, extended family model, male breadwinner model, dual earner model). It is assumed that these four types of family support create specific dependencies within the family, which in case of separation or divorce may have negative economic consequences for the weaker partner. The central question is how much economic autonomy is granted to the weaker family members within each of the four models. Following a thorough discussion of the institutional setting in each of the selected countries, it is assumed that economic autonomy is highest in Sweden and lowest in Italy with Belgium, Germany, and Great Britain ranging in between. Using a cross-national data set of separations developed by the authors from national household panels in these five countries, a large number of partnership dissolutions are studied over time. The observation period is long enough to distinguish short- from long-term consequences of partnership dissolution and in doing so to add to previous comparative research. Using multivariate panel data models it is shown that (i) adjusted household income is affected for both genders; however more negatively for women than for men, (ii) the income decline is highest in Italy and lowest in Sweden, and (iii) British and German women recover rather quickly from the negative economic effects of separation. Sweden stands out as the country with the highest gender equalities with respect to post-separation incomes. However, the model does not convince without having a blemish: in the long run both Swedish men and women have to deal with long-lasting financial consequences after separation, which do not appear to the same extent in any of the other countries.
Manuscript received: March 1, 2005.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. van Damme, M. Kalmijn, and W. Uunk The Employment of Separated Women in Europe: Individual and Institutional Determinants Eur. Sociol. Rev., April 1, 2009; 25(2): 183 - 197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Covizzi Does Union Dissolution Lead to Unemployment? A Longitudinal Study of Health and Risk of Unemployment for Women and Men Undergoing Separation Eur. Sociol. Rev., July 1, 2008; 24(3): 347 - 361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Dewilde and W. Uunk Remarriage as a Way to Overcome the Financial Consequences of Divorce--A Test of the Economic Need Hypothesis for European Women Eur. Sociol. Rev., July 1, 2008; 24(3): 393 - 407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Raeymaeckers, C. Dewilde, L. Snoeckx, and D. Mortelmans Childcare Strategies of Divorced Mothers in Europe: A Comparative Analysis Eur. Sociol. Rev., February 1, 2008; 24(1): 115 - 131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|