European Sociological Review Advance Access originally published online on January 25, 2006
European Sociological Review 2006 22(2):157-170; doi:10.1093/esr/jci049
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Welfare Regimes and Attitudes Towards Redistribution: The Regime Hypothesis Revisited
The Danish National Institute of Social Research, Herluf Trolles Gade 11, DK-1052 Copenhagen K, Denmark. Tel.: +45 33 48 08 77; Fax: +45 33 48 08 33. E-mail: Mads{at}sfi.dk
This paper addresses the issue of why comparative research on welfare state attitudes has failed to establish a link between welfare regimes and popular support for redistribution. Several limitations in the existing literature regarding the dependent variable, the operationalisation of welfare regimes, how the relationship between regimes and attitudes is identified, and the methods used are proposed as reasons why no link between regimes and attitudes has been found. An alternative approach is developed in which welfare regimes are operationalised using a range of theoretically defining characteristics, e.g. total public social spending, benefit generosity, and the weight of social services relative to total public social expenditure. Using data on 13 Western European countries from the first two waves of the European Social Survey, the empirical analysis provides mixed support for the hypothesized relationship between welfare regimes and support for redistribution. Several suggestions for future research are also discussed.
Manuscript received: July 1, 2005.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. M. Jaeger United But Divided: Welfare Regimes and the Level and Variance in Public Support for Redistribution Eur. Sociol. Rev., December 1, 2009; 25(6): 723 - 737. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Busemeyer, A. Goerres, and S. Weschle Attitudes towards redistributive spending in an era of demographic ageing: the rival pressures from age and income in 14 OECD countries Journal of European Social Policy, July 1, 2009; 19(3): 195 - 212. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Pfeifer Public Opinion on State Responsibility for Minimum Income Protection: A Comparison of 14 European Countries Acta Sociologica, June 1, 2009; 52(2): 117 - 134. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. G. Jakobsen Public versus Private: The Conditional Effect of State Policy and Institutional Trust on Mass Opinion Eur. Sociol. Rev., April 30, 2009; (2009) jcp023v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Wendt, J. Kohl, M. Mischke, and M. Pfeifer How Do Europeans Perceive Their Healthcare System? Patterns of Satisfaction and Preference for State Involvement in the Field of Healthcare Eur. Sociol. Rev., March 13, 2009; (2009) jcp014v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Erlinghagen Self-Perceived Job Insecurity and Social Context: A Multi-Level Analysis of 17 European Countries Eur. Sociol. Rev., April 1, 2008; 24(2): 183 - 197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Yodanis and S. Lauer Economic Inequality In and Outside of Marriage: Individual Resources and Institutional Context Eur. Sociol. Rev., December 1, 2007; 23(5): 573 - 583. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Blekesaune Economic Conditions and Public Attitudes to Welfare Policies Eur. Sociol. Rev., July 1, 2007; 23(3): 393 - 403. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


