Skip Navigation


European Sociological Review Advance Access originally published online on June 1, 2005
European Sociological Review 2005 21(3):301-309; doi:10.1093/esr/jci019
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/3/301    most recent
jci019v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Poortman, A.-R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Women’s Work and Divorce: A Matter of Anticipation? A Research Note

Anne-Rigt Poortman

Department of Social-Cultural Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1081, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31 20 5986720; Fax: +31 20 5986810; Email: ar.poortman{at}fsw.vu.nl

The most common hypothesis on the positive association between wives’ work and divorce is that the wife’s work increases the risk of divorce. Critics argue that the causal direction is the other way around and that women adjust their working hours in anticipation of divorce. These competing hypotheses are tested by comparing the effects of wives’ work between divorces that differ in the extent to which they were expected. Because women who do not expect to divorce are not able to adjust their working efforts prior to divorce, it is argued that, if anticipatory behaviour plays a role, the effect of wives’ work should be smaller when the divorce was unexpected. The results lend weak support for anticipatory behaviour. The effect of wives’ full-time work is smaller for unexpected divorces. However, the effect of full-time work is also relatively strong when the divorce was fully unexpected. Moreover, the effects of wives’ work and working hours do not differ significantly between divorces varying in the extent to which they were expected. These findings suggest that there is something about wives’ work that increases the divorce risk.

Manuscript received: June 2003.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Eur Sociol RevHome page
M. van Damme, M. Kalmijn, and W. Uunk
The Employment of Separated Women: The Impact of Individual and Institutional Factors
Eur. Sociol. Rev., August 8, 2008; (2008) jcn042v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.