Skip Navigation


European Sociological Review Advance Access originally published online on May 19, 2005
European Sociological Review 2005 21(3):273-288; doi:10.1093/esr/jci017
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/3/273    most recent
jci017v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Halleröd, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Sharing of Housework and Money Among Swedish Couples: Do They Behave Rationally?

Björn Halleröd

Department of Sociology, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden. Tel: +46-90-786-5652. Email: bjorn.hallerod{at}soc.umu.se

The article deals with issues of intra-household sharing of work and money. The point of departure is taken from well-established theories about spouses’ relative market productivity, bargaining power and economic dependency. Data are from 1998 and were taken from a sample of Swedish households. A number of specific hypotheses were tested using structural modelling. Support for the tested theories was meagre. It could not be shown that differences in spouses’ relative market productivity or income dependency increase over time as a result of ongoing specialisation. Instead, the reverse seems to be true. Differences in spouses’ market productivity did not affect, in the expected way, the time they devoted to market work. On the contrary, the data suggest that the greater the difference in productivity, the lesser the difference in market work time. Neither did the assumption about a trade-off between housework sharing and money sharing materialise in the anticipated way. Instead of trading housework for money it seems that, contrary to the theory, access to money coincides with the ability to avoid housework. Throughout the analysis separate models were estimated for the ‘atypical’ household, in which the wife had the highest income/productivity. The results did challenge the assumption that the tested theories are gender neutral.

Manuscript received: April 2003.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of European Social PolicyHome page
E. Bernhardt, T. Noack, and T. H. Lyngstad
Shared housework in Norway and Sweden: advancing the gender revolution
Journal of European Social Policy, August 1, 2008; 18(3): 275 - 288.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Sociol RevHome page
S. Sarasa
Do Welfare Benefits Affect Women's Choices of Adult Care Giving?
Eur. Sociol. Rev., February 1, 2008; 24(1): 37 - 51.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Gender SocietyHome page
F. M. Deutsch
Undoing Gender
Gender Society, February 1, 2007; 21(1): 106 - 127.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.