Skip Navigation


European Sociological Review Advance Access originally published online on May 19, 2005
European Sociological Review 2005 21(3):227-241; doi:10.1093/esr/jci014
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/3/227    most recent
jci014v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ayalon, H.
Right arrow Articles by Yogev, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Field of Study and Students’ Stratification in an Expanded System of Higher Education: The Case of Israel

Hanna Ayalon

Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel. E-mail: ayalon{at}post.tau.ac.il. Fax: 972-3-6409215.

Abraham Yogev

School of Education, Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.

The paper examines the hypothesis that the opportunities that the expansion and diversification of higher education open to members of disadvantaged groups depend on field of study. The study is based on a survey conducted in 1999 on a sample of 4061 Israeli freshmen in the research universities and the academic colleges, which are often perceived as the second tier of higher education. Using multinomial logistic regression we compared socio-demographic characteristics and academic ability of university and college students within seven major fields of study. The main findings are as follows: The colleges increase the relative odds of disadvantaged groups of studying less selective fields, or selective fields that get different curricula and academic degrees at the colleges. College and university students who study the selective fields where both institutional types offer equivalent programmes carry a similar social profile. Control for academic ability does not change that pattern. We conclude that the expansion of higher education in Israel reduces inequality in enrolment mainly in the fields that carry limited social advantages. Our findings are consistent with Lucas’s (2001) claim that privileged groups look for qualitative advantages in differentiated educational systems.

Manuscript received: July 2004.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
International Journal of Comparative SociologyHome page
M. Duru-Bellat, A. Kieffer, and D. Reimer
Patterns of Social Inequalities in Access to Higher Education in France and Germany
International Journal of Comparative Sociology, August 1, 2008; 49(4-5): 347 - 368.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Comparative SociologyHome page
M. Jackson, R. Luijkx, R. Pollak, L.-A. Vallet, and H. G. van de Werfhorst
Educational Fields of Study and the Intergenerational Mobility Process in Comparative Perspective
International Journal of Comparative Sociology, August 1, 2008; 49(4-5): 369 - 388.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSISHome page
A. Addi-Raccah and H. Ayalon
From High School to Higher Education: Curricular Policy and Postsecondary Enrollment in Israel
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, March 1, 2008; 30(1): 31 - 50.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Sociol RevHome page
U. Shwed and Y. Shavit
Occupational and Economic Attainments of College and University Graduates in Israel
Eur. Sociol. Rev., September 1, 2006; 22(4): 431 - 442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.