Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Linos, K.
Right arrow Articles by West, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

European Sociological Review 19:393-409 (2003)
© 2003 Oxford University Press

Self-interest, Social Beliefs, and Attitudes to Redistribution. Re-addressing the Issue of Cross-national Variation

Katerina Linos and Martin West

Department of Government, Harvard University, Littauer Center (North Yard), 1875 Cambridge Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. Email: linos{at}fas.harvard.edu;mrwest{at}fas.harvard.edu

Stefan Svallfors' 1997 conclusion that patterns of attitudes towards redistribution are essentially the same across welfare-state regimes rests on a questionable treatment of missing data and on poor operationalization of the theoretical determinants of public opinion. Using demographic variables to improve the model specification, we identify cross-country differences in the social bases of support for redistribution that confirm predictions of welfare-state scholarship. The gap between married and unmarried people is unimportant in universalist regimes; the insider/outsider cleavage is more important in conservative and specific skills systems; class matters more in liberal regimes. We find additional cross-national variation when we examine whether popular support for redistribution is related to beliefs about social mobility. Specifically, beliefs about why people get ahead in society are key determinants of attitudes towards redistribution in the United States and Australia, but play a more limited role in Norway and Germany.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Int J Public Opin ResHome page
M. M. Jaeger
Does Left-Right Orientation have a Causal Effect on Support for Redistribution? Causal Analysis with Cross-sectional Data Using Instrumental Variables
Int. J. Public Opin. Res., September 1, 2008; 20(3): 363 - 374.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 European Union PoliticsHome page
K. Kaltenthaler, S. Ceccoli, and R. Gelleny
Attitudes toward Eliminating Income Inequality in Europe
European Union Politics, June 1, 2008; 9(2): 217 - 241.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Sociol RevHome page
M. Blekesaune
Economic Conditions and Public Attitudes to Welfare Policies
Eur. Sociol. Rev., July 1, 2007; 23(3): 393 - 403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Acta SociologicaHome page
M. M. Jaeger
What Makes People Support Public Responsibility for Welfare Provision: Self-interest or Political Ideology?: A Longitudinal Approach
Acta Sociologica, September 1, 2006; 49(3): 321 - 338.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Sociol RevHome page
J. Blasius and V. Thiessen
Assessing Data Quality and Construct Comparabilityin Cross-National Surveys
Eur. Sociol. Rev., July 1, 2006; 22(3): 229 - 242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Sociol RevHome page
M. M. Jaeger
Welfare Regimes and Attitudes Towards Redistribution: The Regime Hypothesis Revisited
Eur. Sociol. Rev., April 1, 2006; 22(2): 157 - 170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.