Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fahey, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

European Sociological Review 18:51-64 (2002)
© 2002 Oxford University Press

The Family Economy in the Development of Welfare Regimes: A Case Study

Tony Fahey

The Economic and Social Research Institute, 4 Burlington Road, Dublin 4, Ireland. tony.-fahey{at}esri.ie

Comparative welfare state research has developed an interest in the role of the family in welfare regimes and in agrarian social classes as influences on the formation of welfare states. This paper seeks to bring together and extend these perspectives by exploring the role of state support for family-based economic production, especially family farming, in the evolution of welfare regimes. Family employment is a de-commodified alternative to wage labour. As such, it received extensive support in many of today's advanced welfare states at various points over the past century, giving rise to a form of social protection which differed from that offered by welfare provisions in the usual sense. The paper illustrates this contention by reference to Ireland from around 1870 until the Second World War, where massive state intervention in social and economic life designed to promote small-scale family farming was a core element of ‘social policy’ broadly defined. The paper also points to other emerging welfare states where broadly similar processes could be found. Though the details and outcomes of those processes varied widely, they point to ways in which both the familial and agrarian dimensions of social policy have a greater significance in welfare regimes than has yet been adequately recognized.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Consumer CultureHome page
P. Dolan
Developing Consumer Subjectivity in Ireland: 1900--80
Journal of Consumer Culture, March 1, 2009; 9(1): 117 - 141.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.