Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elliott, J.
Right arrow Articles by Egerton, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

European Sociological Review 17:145-168 (2001)
© 2001 Oxford University Press

The Influence of Qualifications on Women's Work Histories, Employment Status and Earnings at Age 33

Jane Elliott, Angela Dale and Muriel Egerton

Department of Sociology, Social Policy, and Social Work Studies, University of Liverpool, Eleanor Rathbone Building, Myrtle Street, Liverpool L69 3BX. Jane. Elliott{at}liv.ac.uk
Cathie Marsh Centre for Census and Survey Research, Faculty of Economic and Social Studies, Manchester University, Manchester M13 9PL

This paper examines the relationship between women's qualifications and their labour-market participation up to the age of 33 for a cohort of women born in Great Britain in one week of march 1958. The period of the life-cycle on which the analysis focuses is one during which many women are attempting to juggle the competing demands of young children and employment. In Britain, with very limited institutional support for retaining employment during family formation, we examine the role which occupationally specific qualifications exert in helping women to return to paid employment. The second part of the paper focuses on the occupational attainment of women at age 33, operationalized using log hourly earnings. The earnings equations are corrected for possible selectivity bias into employment. The paper makes an important theoretical distinction between occupationally specific and non-occupational qualifications. We argue that, for women, occupational qualifications are associated with greater attachment to the labour-market following the birth of children. By including work history variables in the earnings equation we ate also able to examine the consequences for women's wages of having time out of the labour market.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Sociol RevHome page
A. Dale, J. Lindley, and S. Dex
A Life-Course Perspective on Ethnic Differences in Women's Economic Activity in Britain
Eur. Sociol. Rev., September 1, 2006; 22(4): 459 - 476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Sociol RevHome page
A. Dale, J. Lindley, and S. Dex
A Life-course Perspective on Ethnic Differences in Women's Economic Activity in Britain
Eur. Sociol. Rev., July 1, 2006; 22(3): 323 - 337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
A. Jenkins
Women, lifelong learning and transitions into employment
Work Employment Society, June 1, 2006; 20(2): 309 - 328.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
OXF ECON PAPHome page
J. K. Lindley, A. Dale, and S. Dex
Ethnic differences in women's employment: the changing role of qualifications
Oxf. Econ. Pap., April 1, 2006; 58(2): 351 - 378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
International SociologyHome page
A. H.-n. Chan
The Effects of Full-Time Domestic Workers on Married Women's Economic Activity Status in Hong Kong, 1981-2001
International Sociology, January 1, 2006; 21(1): 133 - 159.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
J. Elliott
Comparing occupational segregation in Great Britain and the United States: the benefits of using a multi-group measure of segregation
Work Employment Society, March 1, 2005; 19(1): 153 - 174.
[PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.