European Sociological Review 16:119-135 (2000)
© 2000 Oxford University Press
The Puzzle of Gender Segregation and Inequality: A Cross-National Analysis
1 Sociological Research Group, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Cambridge, Free School Lane, Cambridge CB2 3RQ, UK
2 Department of Sociology and Social Anthropology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 3J5, Canada
3 Sociological Research Group, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Cambridge, Free School Lane, Cambridge CB2 3RQ, UK
Correspondence: rmb1{at}cus.cam.ac.uk
Correspondence: jarman{at}is.dal.ca
Correspondence: beb20{at}cus.cam.ac.uk
Occupational gender segregation has generally been assumed to be a structure of gender inequality in the labour market; high levels of segregation are equated with high levels of gender inequality in a society. The paper questions this assumption. It examines, across a range of countries, the relations between United Nations development measures of gender equality and segregation levels. Contrary to conventional expectations, correlations are found to be positive. To explain these results it is argued that segregation, as measured by conventional segregation indices, is not necessarily indicative of gender inequality which operates to the advantage of men in national labour markets. The usual segregation measures are argued to be the resultant of two components: vertical segregation measuring inequality, and horizontal segregation measuring difference without inequality (here vertical and horizontal are used in their usual mathematical sense rather than the special senses sometimes found in segregation literature). It concludes that the relationship between segregation and inequality is far more complex than previously recognized.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. Tomlinson, W. Olsen, and K. Purdam Women Returners and Potential Returners: Employment Profiles and Labour Market Opportunities--A Case Study of the United Kingdom Eur. Sociol. Rev., October 7, 2008; (2008) jcn053v2. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Knox Gender desegregation and equal employment opportunity in Australian luxury hotels: Are we there yet? Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, August 1, 2008; 46(2): 153 - 172. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Magnusson Gender, Occupational Prestige, and Wages: A Test of Devaluation Theory Eur. Sociol. Rev., July 8, 2008; (2008) jcn035v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Menahem and N. Elias Gendered Occupational Differences and Earnings Gaps in Globalising Urban Economies: The Case of Tel-Aviv Urban Stud, October 1, 2007; 44(11): 2211 - 2229. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Kumlin The Sex Wage Gap in Japan and Sweden: The Role of Human Capital, Workplace Sex Composition, and Family Responsibility Eur. Sociol. Rev., April 1, 2007; 23(2): 203 - 221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. M. Blackburn and J. Jarman Gendered Occupations: Exploring the Relationship between Gender Segregation and Inequality International Sociology, March 1, 2006; 21(2): 289 - 315. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. J. Watts On the Conceptualisation and Measurement of Horizontal and Vertical Occupational Gender Segregation Eur. Sociol. Rev., December 1, 2005; 21(5): 481 - 488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Elliott Comparing occupational segregation in Great Britain and the United States: the benefits of using a multi-group measure of segregation Work Employment Society, March 1, 2005; 19(1): 153 - 174. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Charles Deciphering Sex Segregation: Vertical and Horizontal Inequalities in Ten National Labor Markets Acta Sociologica, December 1, 2003; 46(4): 267 - 287. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. M. Blackburn, B. Brooks, and J. Jarman The Vertical Dimension of Occupational Segregation Work Employment Society, September 1, 2001; 15(3): 511 - 538. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|