Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kalmijn, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lippe, T. v. d.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

European Sociological Review 13:1-15 1997
© 1997 Oxford University Press


research-article

Type of Schooling and Sex Differences in Earnings in the Netherlands

Mattbijs Kalmijn and Tanja van der Lippe

Department of Sociology Heidelberglaan 1, 3584 CS Utrecht, Netherlands.

Though men and women now achieve similar level of schooling, the types of fields they study still vary widely. Men are overrepresented in technical and economic fields, whereas women are overrepresented in socio-cultural and service fields. In this paper, we examine to what extent the type of field people study affects their earnings, and we try to determine to what extent prevailing differences in type - as opposed to amount - of schooling contribute to the sex difference in earnings. To answer these questions, we estimate standard human capital models of earnings using a large nationally representative sample of higher educated men and women in the Netherlands. We augment previous models by developing a multi-dimensional measure of educational attainment. We subsequently show that male types of tracing generally have higher earnings returns than female types, that the new schooling measures explain considerably more of the gender gap in earnings than standard measures, and that rates of return to specific types of training have a tendency to differ between men and women.

Manuscript received: November 1, 1994.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
International Journal of Comparative SociologyHome page
D. Reimer, C. Noelke, and A. Kucel
Labor Market Effects of Field of Study in Comparative Perspective: An Analysis of 22 European Countries
International Journal of Comparative Sociology, August 1, 2008; 49(4-5): 233 - 256.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Comparative SociologyHome page
M. Jackson, R. Luijkx, R. Pollak, L.-A. Vallet, and H. G. van de Werfhorst
Educational Fields of Study and the Intergenerational Mobility Process in Comparative Perspective
International Journal of Comparative Sociology, August 1, 2008; 49(4-5): 369 - 388.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Sociol RevHome page
H. Ayalon and A. Yogev
Field of Study and Students' Stratification in an Expanded System of Higher Education: The Case of Israel
Eur. Sociol. Rev., July 1, 2005; 21(3): 227 - 241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Comparative SociologyHome page
H. G. van de Werfhorst
Systems of Educational Specialization and Labor Market Outcomes in Norway, Australia, and The Netherlands
International Journal of Comparative Sociology, October 1, 2004; 45(5): 315 - 335.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science InformationHome page
H. G. van de Werfhorst
A Detailed Examination of the Role of Education in Intergenerational Social-class Mobility
Social Science Information, September 1, 2002; 41(3): 407 - 438.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
YoungHome page
I. Julkunen
A leap forward or a ride on a carousel?
Young, April 1, 2000; 8(1): 3 - 21.
[PDF]


Home page
Acta SociologicaHome page
T. Hammer
The Influence of Different Compensation Levels of Unemployment Benefits on Job Chances among Unemployed Youth: A Comparative Study of the Nordic Countries
Acta Sociologica, January 1, 1999; 42(2): 123 - 134.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.