| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
European Sociological Review 12:87-99 1996
© 1996 Oxford University Press
research-article |
Losing my religion1: a dynamic analysis of leaving the church in the Netherlands
Department of Sociology PO Box 9104, 6500 HE Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Tel: (31) 24 3612042; fax: (31) 24 3612399 E-mail: u211614{at}vm.uci.kun.nl.
Department of Sociology PO Box 9104, 6500 HE Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Tel: (31) 24 3612042; fax: (31) 24 3612399.
In this article, we examine the influence of individual attributes (education, parental education, religious homogamy of parents, religious homogamy of respondent and spouse, frequency of attending religious services, and denomination) and contextual characteristics (cohort and period effects of secularization) on the risk of leaving a faith, using life-event data from the Dutch Family Survey 19921993. This approach allows a stronger test of the direction of causality, and enables us to disentangle life-cycle, period, and cohort effects.
The results show that education, parental education, and marrying a non-religious spouse significantly increase the risk of becoming unchurched. With regard to the influence of both one's own and oneis parents' education, it appears that up to the level of higher secondary education (HAVO) each higher level of education linearly increases the risk of becoming unchurched. Also, the results show a non-linear life-cycle effect: people are more likely to leave their faith when they are in their late teens.Furthermore, our results suggest a period effect: the current level of secularization increases the risk of becoming unchurched.
Manuscript received: September 1, 1994.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Bekkers Intergenerational Transmission of Volunteering Acta Sociologica, June 1, 2007; 50(2): 99 - 114. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hooghe Participation in Voluntary Associations and Value Indicators: The Effect of Current and Previous Participation Experiences Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, March 1, 2003; 32(1): 47 - 69. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||

