Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (21)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Manting, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

European Sociological Review 12:53-65 1996
© 1996 Oxford University Press

research-article

The changing meaning of cohabitation and marriage

Dorien Manting

Statistics Netherlands, Department of Population PO Box 4000, 2270 JM Voorburg. The Netherlands. Tel: (070) 3375236; fax: +31-70-387-7429 E-mail: dmng{at}cbs.nl.

In the Netherlands, the social meaning of both marriage and cohabitation has changed. Cohabitation started as an alternative way of living, developed into a temporary phase before marriage, and finally became a strategy for moving into a union gradually. For women, the perception of marriage as a means of gaining economic security and independence from parents has weakened. The conclusion that both cohabitation and marriage have changed in nature over historical time raises the question whether or not historical fluctuations are present in the influence of forces underlying patterns of cohabitation and marriage. This article addresses the question whether or not individual past and current life-course experiences become increasingly important in explaining the differentiation of entry into marriage across female birth cohorts, and yet become decreasingly important in explaining the differentiation of entry into cohabitation across female birth cohorts. This question is examined using a non-proportional hazard model. Empirical evidence supports this hypothesis strongly, in that both past determinants such as family size or religion and current life-course determinants such as work or education change in their impact on cohabitation and marriage across birth cohorts.

Manuscript received: March 1, 1995.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Family IssuesHome page
C. H. Mulder
The Effects of Singlehood and Cohabitation on the Transition to Parenthood in the Netherlands
Journal of Family Issues, April 1, 2003; 24(3): 291 - 313.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Family IssuesHome page
A.-Z. E. DUVANDER
The Transition From Cohabitation to Marriage: A Longitudinal Study of the Propensity to Marry in Sweden in the Early 1990s
Journal of Family Issues, September 1, 1999; 20(5): 698 - 717.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Adaptive BehaviorHome page
C. Jacobsen
The Process of Crescive Legitimation: Theory, Simulation Model, and Three Empirical Tests
Adaptive Behavior, January 1, 1999; 7(3-4): 255 - 267.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.